Main

June 26, 2007

Father of Family Targeted by Homeland Security Released from Detention

from Desis Rising Up and Moving:

Salaam,

it is with great joy, and much praises to the Most High and to all those who supported, that I share this news....

The Siraj Family, members of DRUM-Desis Rising Up and Moving celebrate….

VICTORY FOR A MUSLIM FAMILY TARGETED BY HOMELAND SECURITY as father is RELEASED from Detention!! THE FIGHT FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CONTINUES…

Another chapter in a nightmare that has torn up a loving Muslim family caught up in the U.S. "War on Terror" brings a VICTORY. With their entire family detained by the US government in various facilities, the father of the Siraj family was released last week. The entire Siraj family was arrested in January---just hours after their 24 year old son, Matin, was sentenced to 30 years in prison for false terrorism charges (based on an NYPD-paid informant), Matin's mother, father and sister were violently arrested in their homes by more than a dozen ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) officers of the Dept. of Homeland Security. The arrest and detention of the entire family was a clear intimidation tactic to silence a family speaking out against the US War on Terror's criminalization of South Asian, Muslim and Arab communities.

2 weeks after the family's detention, buoyed by community organizing by DRUM and countless supporters in solidarity with the family (including hundreds of letters of support to ICE!), the mother and sister were released, albeit on $35,000 bond. The community has continued to support and organize in support of the family and last week, the father was finally released, after languishing in jail for 6 months.

Mr. Siraj, an elderly man with several medical conditions including a hearing impairment, was released under an intensive governmental supervision unofficially known as the ankle bracelet program (involving electronic surveillance); curfew/nighttime house arrest; and parole-style regular check-ins . While Mr. Siraj will continue to live under close watch though he poses no threat, the family continues to face an uphill legal battle, both for their own immigration cases as well as in their son's appeal.

We know that Siraj's release, while a victory for the family and a testament to the power of organizing, also opens up a detention bed for one more and leaves behind over 20,000 of our immigrant brothers or sisters to languish in private detention centers and county jails around the country. Our work must continue…as Congress continues to propose bills that will most likely deepen the crisis for communities, particularly through increasing detention and deportation—we must keep up the fight for legalization without compromising away raids, surveillance, due process, detention and deportation.

SUPPORT THE FAMILY: The family is facing over $50,000 in legal fees; bond debt as well as trying to send their daughter to community college—financial support is desperately needed. Make checks out to: "Shaheena Parveen Siraj". Mail donations to DRUM at: P.O. Box 720187, Jackson Heights, NY 11372

Again, thank you for your incredible support as we continue fighting for this family's freedom and the larger political attack on our communities.

In Solidarity, DRUM

April 12, 2007

Family Targeted by Homeland Security Needs Your Help!

[from a D.R.U.M. bulletin]

Folks,

A quick update on the Siraj family's situation and some quick support actions you can take.

Background: The Siraj family has been a victim of the government's so-called "War on Terror" against Muslims, Arabs & South Asians. First, their son was targeted and entrapped by a paid ($100,000) informant to incite and then entrap Matin in a false "terrorism" case. After a trial in which there were many irregularities, Matin was found guilty and on January 8th, 2007 sentenced to 30 years in prison. As an act of intimidation, less than 12 hours after the sentencing, the Siraj family home was invaded by more than 15 ICE officers and the father, mother and sister of Matin were dragged away to an immigration detention center. 2 weeks later, after community pressure and a campaign & rally organized by DRUM, the mother and daughter were released, but on an outrageous $35,000 bond.

The father, 3 months later, still remains in prison, while the son has been moved to a jail in Indiana. As this government-created nightmare continues, the mother and daughter are fighting for the freedom of their brother/son and father and speaking out against the injustices against their family. More background at www.drumnation.org

Some actions that you can take to support this family:

The father, Siraj Rehman, still remains in detention at Elizabeth Detention Center, having been held for over 3 months now. His severe health problems persist as he suffers from a severe hearing disability, arthritis, breathing problems, depression, and a history of hernias. His detainment has further exacerbated the problems. His file is scheduled to be reviewed for consideration of release on April 19th by ICE. We are requesting another round of support letters to be MAILED IMMEDIATELY to the address indicated in the sample letter included/attached below. Please respond ASAP if you can so they reach ICE in time! **Organizational letterhead is best if you're affiliated, but your personal name and address is fine, too.**

The family is in desperate financial circumstances and needs support for basic survival, attorney's fees, and exorbitant bond of $35,000 they had to pay. Please donate what you can. Your donations are tax-deductible. Please make checks out to:

DRUM, with "Siraj Family Support Fund" in the memo line.

MAIL to:
DRUM
PO Box 720187
Jackson Heights, NY 11372

The son, Matin Siraj, has been moved out of NY, 800 miles away to the Terre Haute Federal Correctional Institution in Indiana. This facility has received some minor media coverage for the fact that it is instituting a policy of segregating Muslim and Arab prisoners into a special Communications Management Unit whereby the freedoms and communications of the prisoners in the unit are being severely restricted and closely monitored. These policies raise several civil rights, racial profiling, prisoner rights, and procedural issues, all within the context of increasing repressive measures by this government in its so-called "War on Terror."

On a practical level, this has meant that the family is unable to visit Matin due to the financial and logistical obstacles posed by the distance and the "special" procedures for visitation. It has also limited the amount of phone calls Matin is allowed to make to his family, who he may speak to, and the language in which the calls are conducted. For more information:

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/Documents_show_new_secretive_new_US_0216.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/24/AR2007022401231.html

Again, thank you for your incredible support as we continue fighting for this family's freedom and the larger political attack on our communities. For more information, or an attachment of the letter, please check at DRUM's website. (http://www.drumnation.org ). For more information please contact Fahd Ahmed at fahd@drumnation.org.

Sample letter available at: http://www.drumnation.org/resources/RehmanLetter.doc

Or select & paste the text below:

April 10, 2007

Deportation Officer Keith Cozine
US Dept of Homeland Security
Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Elizabeth Detention Center
625 Evans Street , Room 148A
Elizabeth, NJ

Dear Officer Cozine,

RE: Release from Detention of Siraj Abdul Rehman

I am writing to support the immediate release of Siraj Abdul Rehman who has been held at Elizabeth Detention Center in New Jersey since Tuesday, January 9, 2007. I fully support his immediate release on recognizance or a reasonable bond and understand that his case is being administratively reviewed by your office.

Mr. Rehman is a deeply loved member of a peace-loving family that has worked hard in this country for several years since escaping persecution in Pakistan. Mr. Rehman is hard-working, cares deeply about civic and family matters, has no criminal record, and is simply looking to live peacefully with his family intact. Under no circumstances does Mr. Rehman represent a flight risk for several reasons; the family is deeply rooted in New York's South Asian community and is absolutely committed to staying in this country in order to seek justice in their son's criminal case as well as to apply for asylum. In no way does the family pose a flight risk due to their deep commitments, obligations, and solid community roots to community organizations and religious institutions. As such, Mr. Rehman should be released on recognizance or a reasonable bond as he poses no threat to society, is not a flight risk because he intends to pursue an appeal in his son's case, and is deeply rooted within the community.

For a father that has already lost his son to imprisonment, Mr. Rehman's spirit and health is on the verge of breaking due to detention. If continuously detained, Mr. Rehman will be prevented from a fair opportunity to follow through on appealing for justice for his son's case as well as being separated from his wife and daughter who are in desperate financial and emotional straits. As you may know, Mr. Rehman's suffers from disabling health problems ranging from a severe hearing disability to chronic breathing problems, depression, severe arthritis and a history of hernias.

Out of respect of civil rights and due process, as Mr. Rehman's entire family was detained on Tuesday January 9th, I am concerned that the Siraj family was indiscriminately chosen for arrest due to the alleged charges of terrorism against their young son, Siraj Matin. Approximately 12 hours after receiving the devastating news of an indiscriminate and lengthy sentence for their son, they were arrested for relatively minor immigration violations that do not necessitate detention. Due to countless legal and constitutional irregularities connected to their son's case, the family has overwhelming community support, and the family should not be punished through detention for pursuing justice for their son. If deported, a young son will be left to perish in prison and the lives of an entire, peace-loving family will be ruined. I respectfully request that ICE exercises compassion and justice for Mr. Rehman in granting release.

Sincerely,

[name, address, organization, if applicable]

August 16, 2006

Detainee report "too damning" to release?

By Samantha Henry
HERALD NEWS

Nearly eight months after the Department of Homeland Security said it would issue the first official report on the treatment of immigrants in federal detention, immigrant-rights advocates are wondering what's taking so long.

"I don't think they intend to release it -- it's too damning," said Jeannette Gabriel, an organizer with the New Jersey Civil Rights Defense Committee. "If the audit is released, even the haphazard audit that was conducted, we believe that it would show such systematic abuse, that ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) would be forced to make systemic changes."

The report, conducted by auditors from Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General, examined the treatment of federal immigration detainees at several facilities nationwide – including the Passaic County Jail and the Hudson County Correctional Center -- and how well the jails were complying with federal detention standards.

Homeland Security spokeswoman Tamara Faulkner said via e-mail Monday that the audit's delay was due to "a complex project that involved accumulating and analyzing information gleaned from myriad sources and many facilities."

Faulkner said the Inspector General had launched the investigation in 2005 in response to complaints of abuse and poor treatment at different facilities used by the federal government to house immigrant detainees. Nearly 60 percent of the estimated 21,000 federal immigration detainees are currently held at county jails and privately run detention facilities. The Passaic County Jail garnered nationwide attention for its treatment of immigration detainees when allegations of physical abuse, including the use of attack dogs and poor healthcare, were exposed in the national media.

Faulkner said in addition to investigating the specific allegations of detainee mistreatment at different facilities, the audit would examine ICE's processes for tracking detainees.

She said the audit was now scheduled for release "in late summer," but declined to specify a date.

Auditors visited the Passaic County Jail over the course of several weeks last summer, where, according to Warden Charles Meyers, they reviewed everything from complaints of under-cooked chicken to the jail's bookkeeping records. They also interviewed a number of immigrant detainees.

In July, Passaic County Sheriff Jerry Speziale threw the auditors out of the county jail for what Meyers said was their unprofessional conduct. After Speziale and Meyers traveled to Washington to meet with DHS officials in August, the auditors were allowed back to finish their work.

In December, Speziale announced he was suspending the inter-governmental service agreement with federal immigration authorities; Meyers insisted the timing was coincidental.

"The audit wasn't related to the suspension (of the DHS contract)," he said. "It was all the unfair press we received and we realized we could make up the money with other federal detainees without the headache."

Meyers referred to the fact that the jail now houses an increased number of U.S. Marshall prisoners to compensate for the loss of moneys DHS paid the jail to house the immigrant detainees, which at one time netted the $12 million in yearly revenue.

Officials transferred out the last of the jail's immigration detainees in April.

Sherriff's Department spokesman Bill Maer said Monday the department did not expect the audit would find fault with the way the jail handled immigration detainees.

"We have no fear. We're not nervous. We hope it's done fairly," he said. "We hope the personal agendas of the auditors are not in play."

Maer said the Sheriff's Department felt that the auditors listened only to detainee advocates.

Gabriel, the immigration detainee advocate, said auditors were "incredibly hostile to community activists and attorneys throughout the process."

Federal guidelines covering the detention of people held on immigration violations -- which are currently civil, not criminal offenses-- do not hold the weight of law. Such standards were drafted after heavy lobbying by the legal community, and the National Lawyers Guild is preparing to petition the government to give the guidelines legal weight.

But until then, detainee advocates said, there is little oversight of the treatment of immigrants taken into custody.

Falah Ajaj, a Palestinian who was held at the Passaic County Jail on an immigration violation for four months in 2005, was one of those interviewed by government auditors. He said he hoped the audit would expose the way detainees are treated and lead to changes.

"I'd like them to close this jail; don't put any inmates in the jail," he said. "If you stay one hour there, you can get sick for 10 years. This is not for human beings, this jail."

July 21, 2006

Vigil Commemorating the Life of Farouk Abdel-Muhti

NYC, 7/21: Remembering Farouk

[Please distribute widely. Note that WBAI will have a special on the Middle on Monday, 7/17/06, 7 pm to midnight; there will be a segment with Sharin Chiorazzo at 11 pm.]

"،Farouk Vive! ،La Lucha Sigue!"
Vigil Commemorating the Life of Farouk Abdel-Muhti

Friday, July 21, 2006, noon to 1 PM

At the Federal Building, 26 Federal Plaza
Broadway at Worth Street
(Take the 4/5/6 or N/R to City Hall, or the A/C/E to Chambers St)

New York-based Palestinian activist Farouk Abdel-Muhti died suddenly of a heart attack on July 21, 2004, three weeks before his 57th birthday and 100 days after he was released from immigration detention. Federal agents and New York City police arrested Farouk in April 2002, just as he was beginning to work as a producer of segments on Palestine at New York's WBAI-FM. The US government then held him in a series of county and federal facilities for nearly two years--in clear violation of his constitutional rights--and refused to release him until ordered to do so by a federal district judge.

Now, as Israeli renews its assaults against Gaza and Lebanon, we need to remember Farouk's lifelong struggle for peace with justice and for the rights of Palestinians, of immigrants and of workers everywhere. Join us in front of the Federal Building, where we vigiled for Farouk's release each Friday at noon, to rededicate ourselves to carrying on his work.

Remember Farouk, and call for a free Palestine. Demand an end to US-backed Israeli violence in Gaza & Lebanon. ،Hasta la victoria siempre!

Speakers to be announced. For more information and to endorse: call 212-674-9499 or email freefarouk@yahoo.com

=========================================================
Committee for the Release of Farouk Abdel-Muhti
PO Box 20587, Tompkins Square Station, New York, NY 10009
Phone: 212-674-9499 * Email freefarouk@yahoo.com
Website: freefarouk.netfirms.com
=========================================================

June 18, 2006

2,179 ARRESTED IN "FUGITIVE" SWEEP

from Immigration News Briefs
Vol. 9, No. 23

On June 14, Assistant Secretary for ICE Julie Myers announced that ICE agents had apprehended 2,179 immigrants in a nationwide sweep between May 26 and June 13. Virtually every ICE field office in the US took part in "Operation Return to Sender," in collaboration with state and local law enforcement agencies. About half of the arrested immigrants had prior criminal records, and 367 were described by ICE as "members or associates of violent street gangs" (presumably without criminal records). Another 640 of the arrested immigrants were "fugitives" who had ignored final orders of removal issued by an immigration judge. The remaining arrestees were immigration status violators picked up during the raids. Most were arrested on administrative immigration violations and were placed in removal proceedings; ICE said on June 14 that 829 of them had already been removed. ICE agents also arrested 121 people on federal criminal charges ranging from felony re-entry after deportation to "illegal alien in possession of a firearm." [ICE News Release 6/14/06]

"It looks like they [ICE officials] are just trying to get numbers for statistics to report back to Washington," said David Wenger, a Detroit immigration attorney, about the raids in the Detroit area. [Detroit Free Press 6/8/06]


Immigration News Briefs (INB), a weekly English-language summary of US immigration news, is forwarded out to the email list of the Coalition for the Human Rights of Immigrants (CHRI). If you receive INB as a forwarded message, and you wish to subscribe directly to INB, or to the CHRI email list (which includes INB and local NYC area events, average 4-5 messages a week), write to nicajg*at*panix.com (indicate "CHRI list" or "INB only").

Immigration News Briefs (INB), un resumen semanal en ingles de noticias sobre inmigracion en los EE.UU., es enviado cada semana a la lista de correo electronico de la Coalicion para los Derechos Humanos de los Inmigrantes. Si el INB le llega como mensaje reenviado, y usted quiere subscribir directamente al INB, o a la lista de correo de CHRI (que incluye INB, mas anuncios de actividades en el area de NYC, promedio de 4-5 mensajes por semana), escriba al nicajg*at*panix.com (indique si quiere "lista de CHRI" o "solo INB").

Contributions toward Immigration News Briefs are gladly accepted: they should be made payable and sent to Nicaragua Solidarity Network, 339 Lafayette St, New York, NY 10012. (Tax-deductible contributions of $50 or more may be made payable to the A.J. Muste Memorial Institute and earmarked for "NSN".)

JUDGE OKS PROFILING OF IMMIGRANTS

from Immigration News Briefs
Vol. 9, No. 23

On June 14, federal judge John Gleeson of US District Court for the Eastern District of New York, in Brooklyn, handed down a 99- page ruling in Turkmen v. Ashcroft, a class-action lawsuit against US government officials, brought by Muslim immigrants detained after Sept. 11, 2001. Gleeson rejected the government's motion to dismiss claims concerning conditions of confinement, and agreed that the plaintiffs can sue over their abusive and unconstitutional treatment. That decision means top federal officials, including former Attorney General John Ashcroft and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) director Robert S. Mueller III, will have to answer to those accusations under oath. Gleeson rejected the government's argument that the Sept. 11 terror attacks justified extraordinary measures to detain noncitizens who fell under suspicion, or that top officials needed special immunity to be able to combat future threats without fear of being sued.

However, Gleeson also ruled that the government has broad discretion to enforce immigration laws selectively, based on a person's religion, race or national origin, and to detain noncitizens indefinitely, for any reason, after an immigration judge has ordered them removed--as long as their removal is "reasonably forseeable." Gleeson admitted that if such profiling were "applied to citizens, our courts would be highly suspicious." The Center for Constitutional Rights represented the detainees and plans to appeal. [New York Times 6/15/06; CCR "Turkmen" Summary 6/16/06]


Immigration News Briefs (INB), a weekly English-language summary of US immigration news, is forwarded out to the email list of the Coalition for the Human Rights of Immigrants (CHRI). If you receive INB as a forwarded message, and you wish to subscribe directly to INB, or to the CHRI email list (which includes INB and local NYC area events, average 4-5 messages a week), write to nicajg*at*panix.com (indicate "CHRI list" or "INB only").

Immigration News Briefs (INB), un resumen semanal en ingles de noticias sobre inmigracion en los EE.UU., es enviado cada semana a la lista de correo electronico de la Coalicion para los Derechos Humanos de los Inmigrantes. Si el INB le llega como mensaje reenviado, y usted quiere subscribir directamente al INB, o a la lista de correo de CHRI (que incluye INB, mas anuncios de actividades en el area de NYC, promedio de 4-5 mensajes por semana), escriba al nicajg*at*panix.com (indique si quiere "lista de CHRI" o "solo INB").

Contributions toward Immigration News Briefs are gladly accepted: they should be made payable and sent to Nicaragua Solidarity Network, 339 Lafayette St, New York, NY 10012. (Tax-deductible contributions of $50 or more may be made payable to the A.J. Muste Memorial Institute and earmarked for "NSN".)

May 30, 2006

Greyhound bus sweeps for "illegal" immigrants

Hi friends,

Last Friday I took a Greyhound bus to Cleveland, Ohio. This bus also stopped in Syracuse, Rochester and Buffalo, NY. When we stopped in Rochester a man whose uniform and truck said USBP -- U.S. Border Patrol I take it, walked onto the bus and began asking people, including me, what country we were from (I'm a half-Japanese half-white U.S. citizen). He flashed his badge and identified himself as "Homeland Security."

The people who were from other countries he asked for their status and I.D. In this case, the I.D. and status of everyone he questioned on the bus seemed to be in order and no one was taken off the bus, and we went on our way.

1. What other reports have there been of this kind of sweep?

2. Have there been reports of people being arrested off the bus in this kind of sweep?

3. What are the legal issues relevant to this tactic?

In "know your rights" literature I've read that if you're questioned about your status you have the right to refuse to answer without a lawyer present. I would like to know exactly what laws to cite and how best to handle the situation, both for myself as a citizen and for someone who doesn't have citizenship status. I'm personally outraged by this and I would be willing to take the bus just to be there when this happens again, so I could stand up and inform everyone on the bus that they have the right not to answer this man. I'd be willing to risk arrest for this, but I would like to know exactly what the law is so that I can stay in the legal "right" while still challenging this outrageous violation of civil rights.

If we can gather more info on when and where this is being done, another worthwhile thing would be to tell people waiting for buses and distribute "know your rights" pamphlets at the Port Authority and other bus terminals.

Anyone with info or thoughts, please post and/or email me.

solidarity,

Konrad Aderer email: aderkon*at*lifeorliberty.org

March 20, 2006

SIGN PETITION to Block Anti-Immigrant Legislation

There is now pending before Congress a very wrongheaded and destructive bill which panders to anti-immigrant hostility and fear by further criminalizing out-of-status immigrants. The bill offers no rational solution to the fact that there are already 11 million "illegal" immigrants in the U.S.

Read an analysis of this bill, H.R. 4437.

Here's the urgent action I received from Desis Rising Up and Moving and Coalition for the Human Rights of Immigrants:

Folks,

This is a critical period of time as several anti-immigrant bills are being
considered in Congress (details below).

Take a second to (1) forward info about this online petition to your
contacts and email lists, (2) post a link to the petition on any websites
you have access to, and (3) sign the petition!

"Oppose anti-immigrant H.R. 4437 and Pass a Just Legalization Bill!"
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/HR4437/
Immigrant Communities in Action

February 23, 2006

NSA Surveillance and the Case of Sherman Austin

Editor's note: I came across this article, contacted the email given for supporters and received a reply from his mother, who as you can imagine suffered immeasurably through the political imprisonment of her son. She gave me permission to repost the article, which I'm doing to raise awareness of this case. Please be sure to visit the support links for Sherman below.

Former political prisoner and former webmaster of Raisethefist.com, Sherman Austin talks about NSA wire-taps and FBI “anti-terrorism” surveillance used against him shortly after 9/11.

by Sherman Austin
edited, typed and posted by Akwala

There seems to be alot of buzz in the media on how Bush authorized the use of illegal NSA wire-taps and surveillance for domestic spying to stop terrorism. I thought I'd write an article summarizing how this was used in my case while running a political web site and direct action network www.Raisethefist.com
[ Raise The Fist ]

BEFORE 9/11

Before 9/11, Raisethefist.com was receiving approximately 2,000 hits daily from people around the world. Government agencies also frequented the site daily, monitoring articles, commentary posted by other users and continuously checking the front page for updates. In many cases Raisethefist.com received over 100 hits in a single day from U.S government agencies, the majority of these hits connecting through Department of Defense gateways. These agencies were mostly federal, FBI, Secret Service, etc. but monitoring also came from local police, California highway patrol, etc.

There was also daily monitoring coming from government and military departments in the UK, Canada, Egypt, Japan, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, etc. on a daily basis. All of this information was filtered, logged and archived through tracking programs I wrote on the server. It's all logged. As raisethefist.com grew more popular so did the hits from government agencies on the site. This type of monitoring didn't just stick to the web site. I would organize events and post information on the site and the FBI would show up. At one event the FBI circled the area in a car stopping people they recognized who were attending the event calling them by name, they also had an undercover agent taking pictures across the street. This is a little taste of what was going on before 9/11/2001.

AFTER 9/11

Right after 9/11, government traffic poured into the web site like never before. I was running raisethefist.com off a number of servers that were connected to a residential DSL line. This DSL line was connected through a residential phone number that was installed in the same room as all the equipment.

Before my home was raided 3 ½ months after 9/11 by the FBI and Secret Service L.A joint-terror task force, they had been packeting the internet line that raisethefist.com was hosted from. In other words they were watching all data coming in and out of the line and saving it on a remote device. [the feds did not have to obtain a warrant. The NSA was secretly authorized to perform this type of surveillance] This started happening immediately after 9/11. In addition they were breaking into several instant messenger accounts and sending messages to other people pretending to be me. For others it wasn't easy to distinguish the difference because they talked just like me. Obviously the team of people the NSA / FBI hired for the job spent a great deal of time doing social profiling while monitoring my conversations. I would be on one screen name then get kicked off, sign onto a different screen name and receive a threat from the other screen name I was just on saying "your ass is going to jail". I was told "this is a matter of national security." They would also threaten friends of mine sending them messages such as "your ass is next." They would send me messages with information they knew about myself, the servers I was running, and the conversations I had online with other people.

I have logs of all this activity. I also confirmed these were indeed the feds when during the raid when I mentioned to the FBI I knew they were packeting my DSL line and hacking into instant messenger accounts. They didn’t dispute my argument. Special Agent John I. Pi with the FBI who conducted the raid said, "How did you find out?" I also got to see the individuals who were hired for the job as they accompanied the FBI at my first court arraignment.

At the same time these instant messenger accounts were being hacked into and commandeered by the feds, my phone line was being heavily tapped. In addition I would also receive calls over the line at the oddest hours of the night. Knowing the line was tapped I never answered the phone until the calls became more consistent. I would pick up the phone asking who was there. Nobody would answer but I could tell someone was on the other end because I could hear them breathing. At first I figured it might just be a prank phone call or something.. but the calls wouldn't stop and became more consistent. Every time I picked up the phone I got no answer. But they wouldn’t hang up either. These calls would come in at spontaneous hours: 1pm, 3am, 6am, 8pm, etc. It got to a point where the calls came 24 hours straight with about 2-5 minute intervals. At this point it was obvious the calls weren't coming from a human being but instead it was some kind of automated system running each call through.

If this alone wasn't peculiar, at the very same time there was alot of unusual activity outside my house. I would come home during the day or late at night and see cars with black tinted windows parked in front of the house. All of the windows were tinted pitch black. They never left until after I parked and went inside the house. In one case two individuals were parked across the street one late night when I arrived home. I noticed there was no other car on the side of the street they were parked on so the they stood out and immediately caught my eye. I watched them in my rear view mirror as I parked and they were both focused directly on me. I turned off my headlights and was about to get out of the car before I hesitated. I started up the car again and drove around the block and they tried to follow me.

These incidents became more and more common and continued to intensify before the raid.

THE FBI RAID 1/24/02

On January 24, 2002, at approximately 4PM--while I was taking a nap--some 25 federal agents from the FBI and Secret Service joint-terror task force were surrounding my house with loaded sub-machine guns, shot guns, and bullet proof vests. I didn't know they were there until my sister woke me up saying there were FBI-looking cars parked all up and down the street and people outside all focused in on the house. I went to the front door and was pulled outside. I saw agents emerge from their hiding spots around all angles of the house with their guns drawn. They had even jumped the fence into the backyard to cover the rear end of the house. The FBI came with a 25 page warrant for search and seizure. They knew exactly were my room was when they entered the house. One agent holding a sub-machine gun said "follow me it's this way" leading the others down the hallway to back of the house to the room where I had the servers. The FBI had pictures of the house including a written description and a complete structural floor plan with every room before they came in. I was probably very lucky I wasn't home alone because I was completely unaware that agents were positioned right outside my bedroom window with loaded weapons while I was asleep. Although I would have probably woke up once they started breaking down the front door with the long piece of special steal they brought with them.

I was told the raid was because of Raisethefist.com. I asked how such an operation could be conducted because of a web site. I was told it was now legal under the new USA Patriot Act (which had passed only 90 days ago).

The secret service asked me if I wanted to see the president killed. The FBI kept trying to ask me about Raisethefist.com and where the logs were. Too bad for them I just happened to purge them before they came. The FBI also said I had content on the web site that dealt with information on how to manufacture explosives. This was a lie. In fact this information existed on a page of a completely different web site I simply had a link to. Nonetheless I was accused of authoring it. The FBI was looking for anything to justify a raid and get their hands on the servers. So they took another persons web site, lied, and said I admitted to authoring it when I never did. The FBI admitted to monitoring raisthefist.com and said I was being watched for along time. When the FBI left they said I had crossed over a line and as long as I got back on the other side of that line everything would be okay. In other words they were telling me to keep my mouth shut and to discontinue "Raise the Fist". After the raid I continued my plans to attend the World Economic Forum protests in New York. The Secret Service notified the New York police chief of my presence. When I arrived I noticed I was being followed and surveilled by agents in an SUV. The police started targeting demonstrators in a number sweeps on the crowd. In the first one I was arrested with 26 other people. We were taken to Brooklyn Navy Yard Jail and I was taken into a back room in hand-cuffs and interrogated for several hours by a detective from the FBI and a Secret Service agent. I was asked if I was terrorist or involved in any terrorist organizations. They asked about Raisethefist. They asked how I got to New York and where my car was parked. They said I wouldn't leave New York until they searched my car. I was then released. I was in the lobby of the court house for about 30 minutes until I was arrested by the FBI and hurried into a black SUV where I was taken to a federal building then to Manhattan MCC where I was placed into a 24-hour lockdown maximum security federal prison cell. I was in the same cell block as those being accused of the U.S.S Cole bombing and the bombing of the U.S Embassy in Kenya. I could hear one of the guards arguing with the inmate in the cell next to mine about the Taliban.

After this 13-day ordeal of being called a "man on a mission" by the FBI, and newspapers such as the New York Post reading "baby-bomb bust" and "teen terrorist" (I was 18 at the time) , I was released as federal prosecutors decided not to file an indictment just yet. They first wanted to go through all of the servers that were seized during the raid.

I flew back to California.

AFTER THE RAID AND FIRST FBI ARREST

You would think at this point that the surveillance and harassment would've toned down a bit since the FBI got what they wanted. But this wasn't the case, it intensified even more. A month later I got raisethefist.com back online by obtaining some remote backups I made before the raid. I also continued my organizing within the community. Raisethefist.com became a network with people setting up chapters in their schools and neighborhoods. This was called the RAISE THE FIST DIRECT ACTION NETWORK. [http://DAN.Raisethefist.com] I encouraged people to start more chapters in their local communities, schools, etc. Chapters started sprouting up around the U.S , Germany, Brazil, Canada, etc. Views were no longer only being discussed online through words but were now being put to action in our own neighborhoods. Because of all the media coverage after the raid and arrest, Raisethefist.com was now receiving allot more hits. Over 140,000 a week. The site worked up so much bandwidth that it was constantly going down because hosting companies complained they couldn't handle the load. Eventually I was able to collocate the server to a high-speed backbone in Irvine.

I moved to Long Beach and worked with a collective at a revolutionary and community empowerment book store which was built right next door to a living quarters where we lived. Immediately after getting raisethefist.com back online instant messenger accounts were being hacked into again. This time the threats were alot more aggressive and consistent. Email accounts that were associated with the raisethefist.com domain name registration were hacked into and used to re-route raisethefist.com to a different server knocking the site off-line. When this happened I posted logs of the conversations and threats I received over the screen name that was being hacked into and commandeered by the feds on http://la.indymedia.org. The next day I received a message with the new password and I was told that I better not try to change it because they were watching and they had full control over whether the site would stay up or not. On one occasion I managed to obtain the IP address of one of the person(s) commandeering these accounts. I traced the IP down to an area of Los Angeles near a federal building.

In addition I was also being followed undercover agents. One time I posted a banner on the top of raisethefist.com announcing a press-conference and march that was being held in Inglewood after the police beating of Donovan Jackson. I left with a group of friends. We took 2 cars. It wasn't until we were on the freeway when our friends in the other car told us we were being followed by a man in the white car behind us. He followed us all the way into Inglewood. When we arrived we parked a few blocks away from the city hall. We could see police and other people in suits on top of the City Hall roof with binoculars, cameras and walkie talkies. Immediately after we parked 4 motorcycle cops drove over to us and followed us to the event. The man in the white car followed us on foot. When we later left we were escorted out of Inglewood by 4 motorcycle cops until we got on the freeway. Being followed like this became a common occurrence. And it also came from local police not just the feds. One time I was riding my bike down the street late at night. A police car drives up in front of me on the sidewalk and stops me. The cop gets out and says , "What's up Austin!" Then 2 more units show up right after him and both police get out and say "What's up Sherman!", "What's up Austin!". I'm then asked about raisethefist.com and where I’m going. I asked them why they were so quick to stop me and how they all knew my name and I learn my picture is hanging up in the police station.

During this harassment and surveillance I was also waiting to hear back from my public defender on whether or not I was facing any charges. After a period of 6 months federal prosecutors call my lawyer and tell him they didn't find anything on the computers to get me for but they didn't want to let me off the hook. So they present us with a pre- indictment binding plea agreement. Something that my lawyer said he's never seen before because he's used to seeing a formal indictment first. But in this case the prosecutors were so quick to present me with a plea deal. The bargain was to admit to authoring and distributing the pages about explosives that existed on the other web site that I didn’t author or distribute. This web site was called the RECLAIM GUIDE. It was authored and implemented by a different individual. And it's not like the FBI didn't know this. 2 weeks before federal prosecutors contacted my lawyer, the FBI paid this person a visit. They confirmed that he was indeed the author of information on how to manufacture explosives and put it on online. Then they left.

False documents were drafted up saying I admitted to authored the "RECLAIM GUIDE" and all the information on how to build and manufacture explosives. These 2 pieces of evidence are actually in the FBI discovery. Apparently the FBI forgot to black-out the part where they visited the person who actually wrote the explosives information. These 2 contradicting articles were ignored by prosecutors. They wanted to pretend they didn't even exist because they know the FBI screwed up. They pressed forward urging that I sign this pre-indictment plea agreement.

THE PRE-INDICTMENT CONVICTION / NSA WIRE-TAPS AND SURVEILLANCE COVER-UP

Everyone keeps asking why I was never formerly indicted. This was to cover up the NSA wire-taps and surveillance.

At a formal indictment evidence is presented to the court or grand jury. This is a formal document written for a prosecuting attorney charging a person with some offense. This document is supposed to contain evidence backing up the prosecutors accusation.

The only so-called evidence the prosecutors had was obtained through ILLEGAL NSA WIRE TAPS and surveillance. I know the prosecutors had this information because they referred to it in a meeting me and my lawyer had with them when I requested to see the all this so-called evidence they said they were going to use against me if I didn't take the plea.

If there was a formal indictment then the FBI would have been forced to unveil the NSA wire-taps and continuous surveillance. Then this whole media buzz about Bush authorizing the NSA to do illegal surveillance against so-called terrorists would have been in the media along time ago. They couldn't afford this type of publicity. This is why they desperately tried to keep this "hush-hush." This is also why they wrote up false-documents stating that I admitted to authoring information on how to build explosives. They could take the fact that I simply posted a link on raisethefist.com to another person's web site which I did not author but happened to contain a page on "bomb-making information," and twist it around. It was all they needed to stir up the 9/11 reactionary emotionalism in the court and get their conviction. The feds wanted this conviction so bad and so quick because they knew what would have happened if this had gone public.

Every time I rejected the plea I was told I wouldn't have a second chance and that the feds would come down on me hard in court and I’d be looking at 3-4 years in prison. They told my lawyer I only had one chance to accept a plea or go to trial. It was a one chance offer and I'd better make my decision right away or face years in prison. I immediately rejected the plea telling my lawyer I wanted a trial. The prosecuters held out and bought time and tried to convince me and my lawyer. I kept rejecting it. Then I told them I would take it. At the arraignment I changed my mind again and said I wasn't taking any plea deal. Now expecting to prepare for a trial, the prosecutors limboed around to buy more time and told my lawyer the deal was still on the table. They said I would be looking at 3-4 years in prison if convicted at trial. I said okay fine and rejected again. Then I changed my mind again at the last minute and asked if I could take it. The prosecutors turned around so quickly with the plea agreement wanting me to sign. They initially said I only had one chance to take the plea and that was it. So I decided to change my mind again and reject it. Then they went into legal limbo again trying to buy more time. Why didn’t they just take it to court like they initially said they were going to do? It was obvious something very fishy was going on. They were so desperate to have me sign the plea. My lawyer said he had never seen a case like this in all the years of his practice.They said they had all this evidence against me yet they never wanted a formal indictment.

DEATH THREATS

During this period of going back and forth to court playing this game of legal limbo I was also receiving countless death-threats from neo-Nazis and white supremacists. I got them by email and they were constantly posted to the raisethefist.com news wire. There had always been death threats from white supremacists, except now they were much more consistent, direct and some cases very peculiar. One made reference to a huge black-out , "when all the lights go off" following with "your nigger ass gets killed." The next day the entire East Coast experienced the biggest black-out in 30 years. This is when several power grids went down in August of 2003 leaving 60 million people from Ottawa to Detroit, from Toledo to Hartford, from Cleveland to New York City without electricity. A day later the same person who posted this threat posted again saying "See I told you so , you better watch out" and followed with more death threat rhetoric. This was all logged and archived on the server.

On August 4, 2003 I was sentenced to a year in federal prison and 3 years probation after being threatened with an additional 20 years under a terrorism enhancement. My lawyer didn't want to take the case to trial under these conditions and I had no legal funds to afford the legal team I needed. I was convicted under statute, 18 U.S.C. 842 (p)(2)(A) "DISTRIBUTION OF INFORMATION RELATED TO EXPLOSIVES OR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION", pushed through Congress by Democrat Sen. Dianne Feinstein in the late 1990s under Clinton’s anti-terrorism bill. The offending material, which again I emphasize I did not author, contained amateurish instructions on how to assemble simple explosives.

The individual who actually wrote this information was not convicted of anything. He was white. As I said before, the FBI questioned him, confirmed he authored this information, and left. They fabricated a case in cahoots with federal prosecutors, Dianne Feinstein, John Ashcroft and Judge Steven V. Wilson.

After I was sentenced government agencies continued to monitor the site heavily. My main concern was getting the site secured and ready for when I went in so it would stay online for the next 4 years without my assistance. 3 weeks before I had to self-surrender the server went down because the hosting company went out of business. The only way to get raisethefist.com back online was to physically pick up the server from where I had it collocated in Irvine. When I picked up the server I was informed that the FBI called them 2 weeks prior asking to get access to the raisethefist.com box. Luckily the guy running the company declined to give them any access. Yet the FBI was actively trying to get their hands on the server once again.

I brought the server back to Long Beach and hooked it up to my residential DSL struggling to keep the site online amidst the threat of feds coming with another search warrant to seize it. Luckily I received assistance to have it moved to a remote location again.

Once I was sentenced, I was ordered to self-surrender to the U.S marshals in 30 days. At this point the death threats came in just about every day. I was told I'd be leaving prison in a body bag. At first I thought the threats were coming from just a couple of people. When I tracked them I noticed they were coming from many different areas and different people.

A few months prior to being sentenced I also received information from anonymous persons telling me there was a price on my head set by the NSA and other higher-ups in the government. I was informed about 3 different supposed assassination attempts to be carried out. I was given some detail on who was serving the contracts, names , license plate numbers, etc. Other then that I was told it was a surprise I was still alive but everything was being taken care of and I was being "looked out for."

After I self-surrendered to the U.S marshals I was taken to San Bernardino detention facility to await transfer to my designated institution. It just so happens that the San Bernardino Detention Facility has the largest number of Aryan Brotherhood and neo-Nazis.

The U.S Marshals, FBI, USPO, and all other government agencies and persons working on my case all knew about the daily death threats coming from neo-Nazis saying they were determined to have me killed once I entered prison. And yet I’m placed in an institution with the largest population of Aryan Brotherhood and neo-Nazis.

I was in the general population dormitory for about a day and a half. I noticed the whites were all in the back of the dormitory. My name is called over the intercom to be escorted to one of the deputy offices. Before I leave one of the white inmates walks up to the front of the dormitory and approaches me. I've never even talked to this guy before. He seems extremely interested in my whereabouts and asks where I’m going. I tell him I don't have a clue. He asks me to find out and tell him when I get back. I get escorted to the office by a deputy sheriff where two detectives from San Bernardino County are waiting to talk to me. They start asking me questions about raisethefist.com such as who was now running the web site. I declined to answer. Then they ask about the death threats I had been receiving prior to coming in. They tell me that a price is on my head and all of the neo-Nazis and Aryan Brotherhoods know where I was and word was out. They tell me the reason why they decided to intervene wasn't to stop anybody from getting hurt but instead it was allot of paperwork if something did happen. San Bernardino would have blood on their hands they didn't want to deal with. So I was placed into PC (protective custody) until I was airlifted to Oklahoma Federal Transfer center where I spent 2 weeks in the hole, then finally to Tucson FCI where I spent another week in the hole before being let out onto the yard in general population.

CONTINUED SURVEILLANCE AFTER RELEASE...FEDS MOVE IN ACROSS THE STREET

My official release date was Sept 1, 2004. After I was released I stayed at my mom's apartment for a few months before I got back on my feet. I had pretty much lost everything so I had to start over. Only 2 weeks being out and the FBI had already moved in across the street. A man and a woman who both worked at the same Westwood Federal Building that Special Agent John I. Pi worked at along with the rest of his team.

They had the blinds closed 24/7 on all the windows. And if a window didn't come with blinds they covered it with black cloth. I noticed something wasn't right early on when I was outside at night walking my dog. I notice the guy who just moved into the unit driving up in his blue car. He parks and sees me across the street and doesn't get out. I walk next to his car and stop and he freezes up. Then I walk the opposite direction down the street and he watches me the whole time through his rear-view mirror. When I’m out of sight he drives off. Then he comes back thinking I’m not around, parks his car, and enters the unit. I noticed there was something definitely strange about the look he gave me but I didn't want to jump to conclusions so quickly. It was later confirmed through a neighbor that they indeed worked at the Westwood federal building. Undercover agents shouldn't talk to neighbors about where they work. But it was pretty obvious anyway. Sometimes when they came home at odd hours of the night and they forgot to take off the security badges around their necks. We have photographs. After about 5 months they finally left.

Today the case is still far from over. I’m still serving the 3 years of strict probation which prohibits me from having any access to a computer as well as associating with anyone who espouses violence for political change (whoever that might be). And due to the nature of the case any time I get stopped or pulled over by the police and my name is run I'm detained because it say's I have "terrorist ties." Harassment and surveillance still continues to this day.

Nonetheless, I'm writing this to show people just how deep this NSA wiretapping and surveillance issue goes. This article is only a summary on my case. This whole issue is far deeper than the Department of Defense simply profiling demonstrators at an anti-war march in Hollywood. And if you happened to be profiled because you attended an anti-war march in Hollywood I’m sure it went far beyond just taking your picture and name and putting you in a database. The fact that every single one of these big anti-war marches are routed down streets with the most security cameras on them speaks for itself.

Bush, Cheney, the NSA, FBI , etc. They're all trying to justify their domestic spying program saying it was necessary to stop terrorists attacks in the U.S. Let's not forgot about the countless people who "look Muslim" or "look middle-eastern" or "look Arab" who were detained and held for months with absolutely no charges. Taken from their homes and their families and eventually deported. Let's stop looking at how the "war on terrorism" targeted political decent for one minute and look how it was targeted against your average citizen simply because of the way he or she looks. Let's stop looking at the police repression used against anti-war marches for a minute and look at how people who never attended a single protest or demonstration in their life suddenly ended up in a 24-hour lockdown maximum security federal prison cell. This is national security. It has nothing to do with stopping "terrorism." Some say we're moving closer and closer to a police state. The fact of the matter is we've already been in a police state. And it's just advanced to the next level. What are we going to do about it? Continue to vote? Continue to pay the price? Will we continue to participate in this political circus of democrats and republicans which is nothing more than a tool to keep the people demobilized and distracted from building a revolutionary movement? Are we going to wait until the next presidential selection only to be bamboozled again, and again, and again? Or are we going to finally realize that we will only get what we are organized to take.


For more information on Sherman's case and contact info please visit http://www.freesherman.org or
http://www.raisethefist.com

Sherman was released from federal prison in 2004 with 3 years of strict probation. He has since been focusing on writing a book about his case and working on music projects playing with the group Colectivo Error.

this article was originally posted at
http://www.infoshop.org
Saturday, February 25 2006 @ 01:03 PM PST

February 21, 2006

10-Year U.S. Strategic Plan For Detention Camps Revives Proposals From Oliver North

from PacificNews.org

by Peter Dale Scott
peterdalescott.net
New America Media
Feb 21, 2006

Excerpt:

The Halliburton subsidiary KBR (formerly Brown and Root) announced on Jan. 24 that it had been awarded a $385 million contingency contract by the Department of Homeland Security to build detention camps. Two weeks later, on Feb. 6, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff announced that the Fiscal Year 2007 federal budget would allocate over $400 million to add 6,700 additional detention beds (an increase of 32 percent over 2006). This $400 million allocation is more than a four-fold increase over the FY 2006 budget, which provided only $90 million for the same purpose.

Both the contract and the budget allocation are in partial fulfillment of an ambitious 10-year Homeland Security strategic plan, code-named ENDGAME, authorized in 2003. According to a 49-page Homeland Security document on the plan, ENDGAME expands "a mission first articulated in the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798." Its goal is the capability to "remove all removable aliens," including "illegal economic migrants, aliens who have committed criminal acts, asylum-seekers (required to be retained by law) or potential terrorists."

read full article

January 24, 2006

KBR awarded Homeland Security contract worth up to $385M

from MarketWatch.com

By Katherine Hunt
Last Update: 12:19 PM ET Jan 24, 2006

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- KBR, the engineering and construction subsidiary of Halliburton Co. , said Tuesday it has been awarded a contingency contract from the Department of Homeland Security to supports its Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities in the event of an emergency. The maximum total value of the contract is $385 million and consists of a 1-year base period with four 1-year options. KBR held the previous ICE contract from 2000 through 2005. The contract, which is effective immediately, provides for establishing temporary detention and processing capabilities to expand existing ICE Detention and Removal Operations Program facilities in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs, KBR said. The contract may also provide migrant detention support to other government organizations in the event of an immigration emergency, as well as the development of a plan to react to a national emergency, such as a natural disaster, the company said.

November 01, 2005

Gitmo Hunger Strikers: Attorneys Win Access to Medical Records

source: Center for Constitutional Rights

On October 25, 2005, in Washington, D.C., United States District Court Judge Gladys Kessler issued an opinion in the case of four Saudi nationals on hunger strike at the Guantánamo Bay prison camp. In an emergency hearing the week of October 14, lawyers with the New York-based law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, which is working in conjunction with the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) argued for contact with their clients and immediate access to their medical records. The attorneys voiced grave concern for their clients’ health, which has reached critical condition since the men began a hunger strike in early August 2005.

Read the story.

August 24, 2005

"LA 8" Hit with REAL ID Charges

Immigration News Briefs
Vol. 8, No. 33 - August 13, 2005

Immigration News Briefs is a weekly supplement to Weekly News Update on the Americas, published by Nicaragua Solidarity Network, 339 Lafayette St, New York, NY 10012; tel 212-674-9499; fax 212-674-9139; wnu@igc.org. INB is also distributed free via email (see below).

On July 25, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) added new charges of deportability against Palestinians Khader Musa Hamide and Michel Ibrahim Shehadeh, longtime US lawful permanent residents the government has been seeking to deport for 18 years. The new charges--brought under the REAL ID Act, approved on May 11 of this year [see INB 5/14/05]--allege that Hamide and Shehadeh are deportable for having been members of the leftist Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP). As with "material support" charges filed against them in September 2003 under the 2001 USA PATRIOT Act, this deportable offense didn't exist at the time Hamide and Shehadeh were organizing fundraising events for humanitarian organizations in the Middle East. The new charges followed a July 7 order from Los Angeles immigration judge Bruce Einhorn postponing indefinitely a hearing scheduled for July 13.

Hamide and Shehadeh are part of the "LA 8," a group of seven Palestinians and one Kenyan arrested early in 1987 and initially ordered deported under a provision of the 1952 McCarran-Walter Act which barred advocating "the doctrines of world communism." Congress ultimately repealed the McCarran-Walter Act in 1990; the US government has adjusted its deportability charges against Hamide and Shehadeh at least five times, while pursuing minor visa violations against the other six--several of whom later won permanent residency. In February 1999, the Supreme Court ruled in the LA 8 case that "[a]n alien unlawfully in this country has no constitutional right to assert selective enforcement as a defense against his deportation," and that federal courts have no jurisdiction to hear such claims [see INB 2/99]. [Committee for Justice (www.committee4justice.com) 6/29/05, 7/9/05, 7/12/05, 8/3/05; Los Angeles Times 6/30/05, 7/14/05]


Immigration News Briefs (INB), a weekly English-language summary of US immigration news, is forwarded out to the email list of the Coalition for the Human Rights of Immigrants (CHRI). If you receive INB as a forwarded message, and you wish to subscribe directly to INB, or to the CHRI email list (which includes INB and local NYC area events, average 4-5 messages a week), write to nicajg@panix.com (indicate "CHRI list" or "INB only").

Immigration News Briefs (INB), un resumen semanal en ingles de noticias sobre inmigracion en los EE.UU., es enviado cada semana a la lista de correo electronico de la Coalicion para los Derechos Humanos de los Inmigrantes. Si el INB le llega como mensaje reenviado, y usted quiere subscribir directamente al INB, o a la lista de correo de CHRI (que incluye INB, mas anuncios de actividades en el area de NYC, promedio de 4-5 mensajes por semana), escriba al nicajg@panix.com (indique si quiere "lista de CHRI" o "solo INB").

Contributions toward Immigration News Briefs are gladly accepted: they should be made payable and sent to Nicaragua Solidarity Network, 339 Lafayette St, New York, NY 10012. (Tax-deductible contributions of $50 or more may be made payable to the A.J. Muste Memorial Institute and earmarked for "NSN".)

August 05, 2005

FUNDRAISER FOR TWO UNJUSTLY DETAINED TEENAGERS

Friday, August 5
5 PM-11PM
Brecht Forum
451 West Street, NYC
(on the West Side Highway
between Bank & Bethune Streets)
see bottom of entry for transit info

For those of you not familiar with the recent case of two teenage girls being detained and interrogated on unsubstantiated allegations of terrorism, read this entry.

Next Friday I'll have the privilege of speaking on a panel about how artists and activists are responding to these kinds of abuses, at a fundraiser for the two girls and their families.

-- Konrad

AMERICA'S CIVIL LIBERTIES CRISIS : Respond with Music and Solidarity!
DISAPPEARED IN AMERICA Exhibition

FUNDRAISER FOR TWO TEENAGERS UNJUSTLY DETAINED
& accused of being a threat to national security
Tashnuba Hyder (Bangladesh): detained and deported with family
Adama Bah (Guinea): detained and eventually released, all charges dropped

5 PM: DISAPPEARED IN AMERICA exhibition (VISIBLE Collective)
7 PM: PANEL DISCUSSION on Arts & Activism in Age of Crisis
8 PM: FUNDRAISER with performances
Performers :
*Bengali musicians
*Guinean musicians
*Spoken word artists

5-7 PM: Opening of DISAPPEARED IN AMERICA exhibit @ Brecht Forum

Brief remarks by members of VISIBLE Collective

7-8 PM: Panel Discussion: Artists & Activists respond to the Civil Liberties crisis

Moderator: Naeem Mohaiemen, VISIBLE Collective

Panelists:
Avideh Moussavian, New York Immigrant Coalition
Aziz Huq, NYU Brennan Center
Fariba Alam (BANGLA EAST SIDE)
Konrad Aderer (RISING UP: THE ALAMS, FAROUK ABDEL-MUHTI: POLITICAL PRISONER)
Film Clips:
RISING UP: THE ALAMS, BANGLA EAST SIDE, DISAPPEARED
8-11PM: Fundraiser for Tashnuba Hyder and Adama Bah
*Family and friends of Tashnuba & Adama talk about the case

Followed by a Multicultural Extravaganza
Performers including:
*Bengali musicians—Bangladeshi Institute of performing Arts
*Guinean musicians—Ahmadou Bah& Others
Classical Musicians: Including pianist tomoya kano
Classical Indian Dance: Samita of KAASH
*Spoken word artists, *Others TBA; *Film Clips
__________________________________________________

DIRECTIONS:
A, C, E or L to 14th Street & 8th Ave, walk down 8th Ave. to Bethune, turn right, walk west to the River, turn left

1, 2, 3 or 9 to 14th Street & 7th Ave, get off at south end of station, walk west on 12th Street to 8th Ave. left to Bethune, turn right, walk west to the River, turn left.

PATH Train to Christopher Street north on Greenwich St to Bank Street, left to the river.

#11 or #20 Bus to Abingdon Square, west on Bethune

#14A or #14D Bus to 8th Ave & 14th Street, walk down 8th Ave. and west on Bethune to the river

#8 Bus to 10th & West Streets for more info email this email address! Or 917 602 4450 ; all proceeds will be divided by the two families!

Donations are tax exempt:
Emergency Families Fund / CAIR
c/o 9-11 relief program / Adem Carroll
166-26 89th Avenue
Jamaica, NY, 11432
www.cair-ny.org

March 31, 2005

Fred Korematsu Passes Away at 86 Years

The Passing of a Constitutional Law Legend

press release from Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund

Press Contacts:

Legal Team Members
Don Tamaki (415) 788-2705
Dale Minami (415) 788-2703
Karen Kai (415) 255-7385
Bob Rusky 415) 255-7385
Lori Bannai (206) 398-4009
Eric Fournier (filmmaker) (415) 971-3305
Peter Irons (530) 284-6138

Fred Korematsu, who President Bill Clinton described as "helping to widen
the circle of democracy by fighting for human rights, by righting social
wrongs, and by empowering others to achieve," passed away on Wednesday
afternoon (March 30th) at his daughter's home. He died of respiratory
failure at the age of 86.

Born in Oakland, California on January 30, 1919 and an American citizen by
birth, Korematsu was among 120,000 Americans of Japanese ancestry living on
the West Coast when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. In the
ensuing months, the Army issued orders rounding up these Americans into 10
Internment camps, each surrounded by barbed wire and machine gun towers and
located in desolate regions from California to Arkansas.

Korematsu defied the military orders, evaded authorities and was ultimately
arrested and jailed in 1942. He appealed his case to the U.S. Supreme
Court, arguing that it was unconstitutional for the government to
incarcerate Americans without charges, evidence or trial. He lost. In its
1944 landmark decision, the high court ruled against him, declaring that the
Internment was not caused by racism, but rather, was justified by the Army=s
claims that Japanese Americans were radio-signaling enemy ships from shore,
and were prone to disloyalty. The court called the Internment, a Amilitary
necessity.@

In a stinging dissent, Justice Jackson complained about the lack of any
evidence to justify the Internment, writing ".the Court for all time has
validated the principle of racial discrimination.and of transplanting
American citizens. The principle then lies about like a loaded weapon ready
for the hand of any authority that bring forward a plausible claim of an
urgent need." Constitutional law scholars have referred to the 1944 case as
a "civil liberties disaster."

Korematsu's case stood for almost 40 years until Professor Peter Irons with
the help of Aiko Herzig Yoshinaga, researching government's archives,
stumbled upon secret Justice Department documents. Among them were memos
written in 1943 and 1944 by Edward Ennis, the Justice Department attorney
responsible for supervising the drafting of the government's brief. As
Ennis began searching for evidence to support the Army's claim that the
Internment was necessary and justified, he found precisely the opposite --
that J. Edgar Hoover of the FBI, the FCC, the Office of Naval Intelligence
and other authoritative intelligence agencies categorically denied that
Japanese Americans had committed any wrong. Other memoranda characterized
the government's claims that Japanese Americans were spying as "intentional
falsehoods." These official reports were never presented to the Supreme
Court, having been intentionally suppressed and, in one case, destroyed by
setting the report afire.

It was on this basis -- governmental misconduct -- that a legal team of pro
bono attorneys successfully reopened Korematsu's case in 1983, resulting in
the erasure of his criminal conviction for defying the Internment.

During the litigation, Justice Department lawyers offered a pardon to
Korematsu if he would agree to drop his lawsuit. In rejecting the offer,
Kathryn Korematsu, his wife of 58 years remarked "Fred was not interested in
a pardon from the government; instead, he always felt that it was the
government who should seek a pardon from him and from Japanese Americans for
the wrong that was committed."

In throwing out Korematsu's 40 year old criminal conviction, Judge Marilyn
Hall Patel of the US District Court of the Northern District of California
wrote:

"Korematsu remains on the pages of our legal and political history. As a
legal precedent it is now recognized as having limited application. As a
historical precedent it stands as a constant caution that in times of war or
declared military necessity our institutions must be vigilant in protecting
our constitutional guarantees. It stands as a caution that in times of
distress the shield of military necessity and national security must not be
used to protect governmental actions from close scrutiny and accountability.
It stands as a caution that in times of international hostility and
antagonisms our institutions, legislative, executive and judicial, must be
prepared to protect all citizens from the petty fears and prejudices that
are so easily aroused."


In 1998, Korematsu received the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation's
highest civilian award. President Clinton's introduction of Korematsu
reflects the significance of his achievements: "In the long history of our
country's constant search for justice, some names of ordinary citizens stand
for millions of souls.Plessy, Brown, Parks.To that distinguished list, today
we add the name of Fred Korematsu."

Korematsu has been the subject of numerous documentaries including the Emmy
awarding film "Of Civil Wrongs and Rights" co-produced by filmmaker Eric
Fournier and Korematsu's son, Ken Korematsu. His daughter Karen
Korematsu-Haigh actively supported Korematsu's interest in civil rights,
helping to found the Korematsu Civil Rights Fund sponsored by the Asian Law
Caucus, the oldest Asian American public interest law firm in the nation.
Karen remarked "I know he was the country's hero, but he was my personal
hero."

Other awards include honorary doctorates from the University of San
Francisco, California State University Hayward, McGeorge School of Law, and
the City University of New York Law School, and official recognition from
the California State Senate.

Korematsu's other community activities include serving as past President of
the San Leandro chapter of the Lion's Club, and actively supporting the Boy
Scouts of America. Funeral arrangements are pending.

March 30, 2005

WITNESSES NEEDED for OIG investigation of detainee abuse

Hello friends,

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) connected to the Department of
Homeland Security is currently conducting an investigation of abuses
against immigrant detainees at four county jails throughout the country.
Two of the county jails being investigated are in New Jersey -- Passaic
and Hudson.

New Jersey Civil Rights Defense Committee is providing support to the
detainees during the interview process. We are looking for people who are
willing to be witnesses to interveiws between OIG representatives and
detainees. You do not need any previous experience to be a witness.
While we are asking for general volunteers we are also specifically
soliciting help from immigration attorneys who would be willing to
volunteer to be present during the interviews.

These interviews will be conducted at Hudson County Jail beginning April
18 and at Passaic County Jail beginning in May. We will be signing people
up to go into the jail as witnesses throughout this time period. Please
contact New Jersey Civil Rights Defense Committee at
info@nj-civilrights.org to help.

New Jersey Civil Rights Defense Committee
http://www.nj-civilrights.org

March 18, 2005

Four Iranian brothers released after long immigration detention in Los

By PAUL CHAVEZ, Associated Press Writer

Thursday, March 17, 2005

(03-17) 00:02 PST Los Angeles (AP) --

Four Iranian brothers detained for more than three years after their arrest in an FBI terrorism probe were freed after U.S. immigration authorities eased certain travel restrictions.

The Mirmehdi brothers — Mohammed, Mostafa, Mohsen and Mojtaba — had rejected a release offer last month, claiming proposed travel limits and other restrictions were unjust. The brothers were released Wednesday night after the government revised its offer and reduced the restrictions, said Virginia Kice, a spokeswoman for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

The brothers declined to sign documents outlining the conditions of their release, but they nevertheless will be bound by the modified terms, Kice said.

The brothers returned home to the San Fernando Valley and told The Associated Press that they would try to resume their careers as real estate agents.

"It was a great victory for us," Mohsen Mirmehdi said by telephone. "After 3 1/2 years of going to this court and that court and proving to them that we are innocent."

The brothers can remain in the United States although two have been ordered deported and the other pair are appealing such orders.

The brothers have been held since October 2001. Federal authorities alleged they supported a Los Angeles-based cell of the Moujahedeen Khalk, or MEK, which opposes Iran's regime and is classified by the State Department as a terrorist organization.

The brothers acknowledged attending protest events against Iran's current regime, but denied belonging to the MEK.

They never faced criminal charges. They were sent into detention to await deportation for allegedly lying in the 1990s on their applications seeking political asylum, and for their suspected ties to the MEK.

Last August, the Board of Immigration Appeals ruled evidence tying the brothers to terrorism was inconclusive. The board also upheld the decision of two immigration judges who said the Mirmehdis would be tortured or persecuted if returned to Iran. The board also agreed with the government that the brothers did not qualify for political asylum.

"One thing is not in dispute. All four men are in this country illegally," Kice said.

Final deportation orders have been issued for Mostafa Mirmehdi, 45, and Mojtaba Mirmehdi, 41, and they will be deported if a third country can be found that will accept them, Kice said.

The brothers' attorney, Marc Van Der Hout, said he doubts they will be deported.

"I don't think any other country will accept them," he said. "Another country won't welcome someone into their country that the United States has accused of being part of a terrorist organization, even though those charges are baseless."

The brothers will be allowed to travel freely within Los Angeles, Orange and Ventura counties, but will need permission in advance to travel outside that area, Kice said.

They also must report to immigration officials weekly by telephone and every other week in person, Kice said.

The brothers' release occurred less than two weeks after an altercation in which the Mirmehdis allege that a guard beat Mohammed Mirmehdi after he intervened in an argument between the guard and one of his brothers.

The allegation is under investigation, Kice said.

February 05, 2005

FOIA SUIT THWARTED?

Immigration News Briefs
Vol. 8, No. 6 - February 5, 2005

On Jan. 11 Marie O'Rourke, assistant director of the Executive Office for US Attorneys, informed the civil rights group People for the American Way (PFAW) that the Department of Justice (DOJ) would charge "approximately $372,799" to search for records the group is seeking. PFAW filed its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in November 2003 for records involving "any request by the government to seal the proceedings of a case in any federal court arising from or relating to the detention of a post 9/11 immigrant detainee."

An "initial canvass of our 93 districts led to an estimate search time of 13,314.25 hours," billed at $28 an hour, O'Rourke told PFAW general counsel Elliot Mincberg in a letter--adding that the estimate could rise with the possible addition of "hundreds of hours" more in search time for the Southern Florida district and four other districts.

The letter came two days before the government was due to explain to a federal court in Washington why PFAW's lawsuit against the DOJ should be summarily denied. PFAW sued last Aug. 23 after the government first refused to release any records--citing federal privacy exemptions--then denied an appeal. PFAW has until Feb. 10 to respond to the fee letter. The DOJ lawyers have asked US District Judge John Bates to hold a hearing the week of Mar. 14.

PFAW hopes to produce a public report about government secrecy efforts against hundreds of unidentified detainees--including Algerian-born Florida restaurant waiter Mohamed Kamel Bellahouel, detained in October 2001 for overstaying his student visa after the FBI claimed he had served food to some of the men involved in the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks. Bellahouel filed a habeas corpus petition (M.K.B. v. Warden) in January 2002 in the Southern District of Florida; his case was kept secret and off the court dockets on orders of US District Judge Paul Huck. Bellahouel was freed around March 1, 2002, but continued to press his habeas case in an attempt to challenge the secrecy order. Bellahouel's name was discovered and made public by the Daily Business Review of Miami only because of a March 2003 clerk error at the 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta [see INB 1/3/04]. [Daily Business Review 1/31/05]

Immigration News Briefs (INB), a weekly English-language summary of US immigration news, is forwarded out to the email list of the Coalition for the Human Rights of Immigrants (CHRI). If you receive INB as a forwarded message, and you wish to subscribe directly to INB, or to the CHRI email list (which includes INB and local NYC area events, average 4-5 messages a week), write to nicajg@panix.com (indicate "CHRI list" or "INB only").

January 21, 2005

FBI, MEDIA GENERATE UNFOUNDED CHINESE TERRORIST SCARE

On Wednesday an anonymous tipster called the California Highway Patrol, claiming that four Chinese people had come into the U.S. from Mexico and were to receive a shipment of "nuclear oxide" to be used in a terror plot in Boston.

Law enforcement officials arranged to meet the anonymous tipster, who didn't show up. In the meeting place were four photos and the corresponding names of two Chinese women and two Chinese men.

On this basis, the FBI released a statement along with their photos, saying they were wanted for questioning on a "dirty bomb" plot.

Every law official who has spoken about this investigation admits there is no corroborating evidence whatsoever to tie these four people to anything. Yesterday, U.S. Attorney Michael Sullivan of Boston said these people are "not wanted at this point in time for any crimes because there's no evidence at this point in time that they've committed any crimes."

Nonetheless, since yesterday, we've been getting headlines like this:

So if you ever want to sic the FBI on someone and brand them in the national media as a "terrorist," just call in an anonymous tip and leave their name and photo. At least if the person is a non-white foreign national.

January 05, 2005

Prosecution in Lawyer's Terror Trial Is Accused of Playing on Fear

January 5, 2005

The New York Times

By JULIA PRESTON

A defense lawyer in the trial of Lynne F. Stewart, a lawyer charged with conspiring with Egyptian terrorists, accused the government yesterday of trying to play on jurors' fears by repeatedly referring to Osama bin Laden and the Sept. 11 attacks during the trial.

The sharp criticism of the prosecutors came on the first day of closing arguments by Kenneth A. Paul, a lawyer for one of Ms. Stewart's co-defendants, Ahmed Abdel Sattar. The prosecutors in the trial, in Federal District Court in Manhattan, have emphasized that Mr. Sattar had numerous telephone conversations with Egyptian Islamic militants who were in close contact with Mr. bin Laden. Mr. Sattar is a Staten Island postal worker who worked as a court-appointed paralegal aide with Ms. Stewart.

Mr. Paul said the prosecutors had "so blatantly attempted to tug and play upon those fears" of "the No. 1 enemy of the United States." He told the jurors that the government had tried "to scare you into thinking" that the case involved "a direct threat to the national security of the United States."

Judge John G. Koeltl has often reminded the jury during the six-month trial that Mr. bin Laden is not part of the case. But Mr. bin Laden still appeared repeatedly in the government's presentation, most notably in a videotape, recorded somewhere in Afghanistan and broadcast on television in the Middle East in September 2000, in which he threatened to attack the United States to win the release from prison of a client of Ms. Stewart's. The client, Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, is a blind Islamic cleric who is serving a life sentence in an American prison for a thwarted plot to bomb landmarks in New York.

Two Egyptian Islamic militants who, the evidence has shown, had frequent telephone conversations with Mr. Sattar appear on the video with Mr. bin Laden.

But the prosecutors never showed that Mr. Sattar had anything to do with making the videotape. The main evidence in the trial was drawn from about 85,000 secretly recorded intercepts of Mr. Sattar's home telephone made by the F.B.I. between 1995 and 2002. Mr. Sattar is facing a charge of conspiracy to kill and kidnap in a foreign country, which carries a maximum life sentence.

The government presented no evidence that Ms. Stewart knew in any detail about Mr. Sattar's calls with the Egyptian militants.

Mr. Paul said Mr. Sattar had followed guidance from Ms. Stewart and other lawyers for Mr. Abdel Rahman when he sent letters to the sheik in prison with messages from Egyptian Islamists. Mr. Sattar did not help to disseminate any message from the sheik that he understood to be a call for violence, Mr. Paul said.

December 17, 2004

In U.S., 44 Percent Say Restrict Muslims

By WILLIAM KATES, Associated Press Writer

ITHACA, N.Y. - Nearly half of all Americans believe the U.S. government should restrict the civil liberties of Muslim Americans, according to a nationwide poll.

The survey conducted by Cornell University also found that Republicans and people who described themselves as highly religious were more apt to support curtailing Muslims' civil liberties than Democrats or people who are less religious.

Researchers also found that respondents who paid more attention to television news were more likely to fear terrorist attacks and support limiting the rights of Muslim Americans.

"It's sad news. It's disturbing news. But it's not unpredictable," said Mahdi Bray, executive director of the Muslim American Society. "The nation is at war, even if it's not a traditional war. We just have to remain vigilant and continue to interface."

The survey found 44 percent favored at least some restrictions on the civil liberties of Muslim Americans. Forty-eight percent said liberties should not be restricted in any way.

The survey showed that 27 percent of respondents supported requiring all Muslim Americans to register where they lived with the federal government. Twenty-two percent favored racial profiling to identify potential terrorist threats. And 29 percent thought undercover agents should infiltrate Muslim civic and volunteer organizations to keep tabs on their activities and fund-raising.

Cornell student researchers questioned 715 people in the nationwide telephone poll conducted this fall. The margin of error was 3.6 percentage points.

James Shanahan, an associate professor of communications who helped organize the survey, said the results indicate "the need for continued dialogue about issues of civil liberties" in a time of war.

While researchers said they were not surprised by the overall level of support for curtailing civil liberties, they were startled by the correlation with religion and exposure to television news.

"We need to explore why these two very important channels of discourse may nurture fear rather than understanding," Shanahan said.

According to the survey, 37 percent believe a terrorist attack in the United States is still likely within the next 12 months. In a similar poll conducted by Cornell in November 2002, that number stood at 90 percent.

December 13, 2004

CONGRESS PASSES "INTELLIGENCE" BILL

from Immigration News Briefs (INB)

On Dec. 7, the US House of Representatives voted 336-75 to approve the 2004 Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act; on Dec. 8 the Senate approved it 89-2. The bill came in response to the 9/11 Commission's recommendations for correcting security problems relating to the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The bill is expected to be signed soon by President George W. Bush. [Washington Post 12/8/04; Washington Times 12/8/04; Govexec.com Daily Briefing 12/9/04; National Immigration Forum Update 12/8/04; Houston Chronicle 12/9/04]

In addition to measures concerning intelligence information- sharing and reorganization, the 245-page bill includes provisions for increasing the number of full-time border patrol agents by 10,000 over five years and the number of full-time Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) investigators by 4,000 over five years. It also orders an increase in the number of beds available for immigration detainees by 40,000 in the same time period, and establishes minimum federal standards for birth certificates and driver licenses. [Govexec.com Daily Briefing 12/9/04]

Other measures in the bill will loosen standards for Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) surveillance warrants, allow the Justice Department to more easily detain suspects without bail and expand the criteria that constitute "material support" to terrorist groups. The bill does include one measure sought by civil liberties advocates: a Privacy and Civil Liberties Board, designed to safeguard individuals' rights. [WP 12/8/04, 12/10/04; NIF Update 12/8/04]

After prior versions of the bill were passed by the Senate on Oct. 6 and the House on Oct. 8 [see INB 10/16/04], a conference committee spent two months fighting mostly over anti-immigrant provisions included in the House version. Most of the representatives who opposed the final bill did so because they objected to the removal of the anti-immigrant provisions; they were outvoted after President George W. Bush promised, in a Dec. 7 letter, that he would consider border security provisions in 2005. "I look forward to working with the Congress early in the next session to address these issues, including improving our asylum laws and standards for issuing driver's licenses," Bush wrote. In a closed Republican meeting on Dec. 7, House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-IL) apparently also promised to include the immigration provisions in a "must-pass" legislative package early next year--most likely attached to a bill seeking $70 billion for military and "reconstruction" spending in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI), who led the fight to keep the anti-immigrant measures in the bill, has vowed to introduce a new bill on Jan. 4--the first day of the new Congress--which will include a national ban on issuing state driver licenses to undocumented immigrants, a higher standard of proof for asylum- seekers and closure of a three-mile gap in a fence along the California-Mexico border. Sensenbrenner said his proposal will not include a Bush-supported "guest worker" plan for immigrants. [HC 12/9/04; NIF Update 12/8/04; WT 12/8/04; WP 12/8/04]

December 06, 2004

Immigration Authorities End Torture-by-Dogs of Detainees in U.S. Jails

NJ Civil Rights Defense Committee Press Release

For Release Dec. 6, 2004
Contact:
Eric Lerner
973-736-0522
elerner@igc.org

Press conference to be held
Monday, Dec. 6
1:00 PM
Rutger’s Newark Campus
Newark, NJ
Hill Hall (Room 208)

To get to Room 208, please go up the ramp from the second floor of Hill Hall. Hill Hall is at the corner of MLK Jr. Blvd. and Warren St., next to the Student Center.

Representatives of immigrants rights and civil rights groups, including NJ Civil Rights Defense Committee, Casa Freehold, Council on American Islamic Relations-NJ, and others will describe how this victory was achieved and the broader context of the struggle for immigrant rights.

The representatives of the groups and detainee family members will explain what has been won so far and the much greater tasks that still must be accomplished to defend the civil rights of all who live in this country.

The immigrant rights’ movement won a significant victory when the Dept. Of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement arm directed that all jails in the US holding immigrant detainees cease to use dogs around the detainees.

The directive, effective Dec. 11, was a response to a report on National Public Radio documenting the use of the dogs to terrify and physically attack detainees. Officials at Passaic County Jail, one of several facilities that used the dogs, stated that they had already removed the dogs from the jail, an action confirmed by detainees.

The NPR report was the result of an 18-month-long campaign by immigrant rights and civil rights groups to expose the use of dogs to torture immigrant detainees.

The canine abuse was first reported to the press by NJ Civil Rights Defense Committee (NJCRDC) in a press conference July 18, 2003. The conference was held in connection with a hunger strike by Nigel Macado and Hemnauth Mohabir, one of the detainees interviewed in the NPR report last week. Since then, NJCRDC, Families for Freedom and other immigrant rights organizations have been vigorously exposing dog attacks. The groups arranged detainee interviews for the NPR story.

This effort has been part of a general campaign to win the release of all the detainees, who are being held unconstitutionally without any criminal charges “This victory is a step forward,” said NJCRDC member Jeannette Gabriel, “but it puts an end to only one type of detainee abuse. The worst abuse is to hold them at all, as they are not charged with any crimes.” Detainees are held by the Department of Homeland Security as “civil” detentions under laws passed in 1996 and vigorously enforced since September, 2001.

The end of the torture-by-dog is one of the limited but important victories which the growing immigrant rights movement has won in the past year. In Freehold, New Jersey, a coalition of immigrants and citizens united in Casa Freehold and other organizations defeated an attempt by the Township government to shut down a muster zone for immigrant day-laborers. With the support of this coalition, the day–laborers were able to organize a hiring-hall-type of system, ending competition among the laborers and enforcing minimum labor standards on contractors. When police harassment drove the contractors away, NJCRDC and Casa Freehold, joined by other immigrant rights and peace groups, organized a march in Freehold in July which succeeded in countering the harassment.

This new civil rights fight is just beginning. Thousands of detainees remain unconstitutionally incarcerated and immigrant communities are under attack. The detainee featured in NPR’s report for being deliberately subjected to a dog bite, Rosendo Lewis, and another detainee, Abdoulie Secka, have just finished a nine-day hunger strike at Passaic County jail to demand their freedom. They report being subjected to threats by ICE officials to move them to other detention facilities thousands of miles from their families. The dogs are gone, but the violations of human rights remain and only continued exposure and protest will stop them.

December 01, 2004

STOP ANTI-IMMIGRANT PROVISIONS FROM BECOMING PART OF THE INTELLIGENCE REFORM BILL

From: Sivaprasad, Shoba [immigrationforum.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 11:37 AM
Subject: FW: Need your help on 9/11 recs bill
Importance: High

We really need your help making calls to these offices to keep the bad immigration provisions out of the 9/11 bill. We are getting reports from Democratic offices that calls are running 5 to 1 in favor of adding the Sensenbrenner immigration provisions to the intelligence reform conference report. FAIR reports a 30 to 1 margin of calls in to Sensenbrenner's office, but they are prone to exaggeration. Still, it's clear that this week is our last big push for the year as negotiations either will or will not advance right now. PLEASE circulate this action alert to your networks and make calls yourself. The call-in week starts today with the White House and Speaker Hastert, and continues through Friday with your own members. Thank you!

TAKE PART IN THE NATIONWIDE CALL-IN WEEK

NOVEMBER 30 - DECEMBER 3

Congress is coming back on Dec. 6th to possibly vote on an intelligence reform bill. We need to make sure that the final bill does not include the bad immigration provisions we have been fighting against. Scroll to the bottom for a short update on the bill.

TAKE ACTION TODAY!

In order to stop the anti-immigrant provisions from becoming law, your voice is needed! Please make two to three calls a day for the next four days:

* Tuesday, Nov. 30: Call the White House at (202) 456-1111 and Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert (R-IL) at (202) 225-2976.

* Wednesday, Dec. 1: Call Rep. Hoekstra (R-MI) at (202) 225-4401 and Rep. Harman (D-CA) at (202) 225-8220. Call the White House if you haven't yet done so at (202) 456-1111.

* Thursday, Dec. 2: Call Sen. Collins (R-ME) at (202) 224-2523 and Sen. Lieberman (D-CT) at (202) 224-4041. Call the White House if you haven't yet done so at (202) 456-1111.

* Friday, Dec. 3: Call your own senators and representative. You can find your representative's information at: http://www.house.gov and two senators' information at: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm . Call the White House if you haven't yet done so at (202) 456-1111.

WHAT IS THE MESSAGE?

When you call, tell them:

I want you to keep the anti-immigrant provisions pushed by Rep. Sensenbrenner out of the intelligence reform bill.

The Senate-led compromise already contains border security measures; the additional provisions pushed by Rep. Sensenbrenner are extreme and were not part of the 9/11 Commission's recommendations.

I want you to enact the real recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, not the agenda of House immigration restrictionists.

Finally, tell them that we need comprehensive immigration reform-not non-solutions that will only drive people further underground and cause panic in immigrant communities.

WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH THE 9/11 BILL?

The weekend before Thanksgiving, Senate members of the conference committee devised a compromise that excluded the worst of the anti-immigrant House provisions but kept several "border security" measures, such as an increase in the number of border patrol agents and a mandate for federal agencies to devise minimum standards for the issuance of driver's licenses (in contrast to the more strident House ID language that would bar undocumented immigrants from obtaining state-issued IDs or using consular IDs).

This was not enough for Representative James Sensenbrenner (R-WI), who insisted on the inclusion of the extraneous immigration provisions. He was joined by Representative Duncan Hunter (R-CA) who objected to shifting intelligence authority and resources from the Pentagon to other agencies. Due to their objections, the compromise was pulled.

Since then, the White House has said it will work to get a bill passed this year. The conference committee leadership also wants a bill this year. Pressure is mounting to finalize the deal, but Representative Sensenbrenner is not backing down.

Congress will come back to Washington, DC for a short session on December 6th to vote on an intelligence reform bill if the conference committee can come to an agreement. We need to make sure that the White House, conference committee leadership, the majority of conferees, and your own senators and representatives (who will have to vote on the compromise measure) do not give in to Representative Sensenbrenner's demands. The President is key in this debate; according to media reports he supports the Senate compromise, but he must hear from us in order to stay strong and bring members of his own party into line.

TO SEND AN EMAIL OR FAX:

If you cannot call Congress and the White House this week, you can also communicate with them via email or fax. To do so go to:

Human Rights First

American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA)
for Congress
for White House

National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium (NAPALC)

YOUR VOICE IS IMPORTANT * TAKE ACTION TODAY

November 23, 2004

"OCTOBER PLAN" TO CONTINUE

from Immigration News Briefs (INB)

The government's "October Plan," allegedly aimed at preventing terrorist attacks before the elections [see INB 10/23/04], has been extended and will continue through the presidential inauguration in January. "We continue to remain concerned about Al-Qaeda's desire to attack the US, and there are a number of important symbolic events ahead of us, including the holiday period and the inauguration," said Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Katy Mynster. Also included is the Feb. 6 Super Bowl football tournament in Jacksonville, Florida.

ICE authorities said on Nov. 5 that they had arrested 237 people in October whose tourist visas had expired or who were in the US on student visas but were not attending school. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) questioned more than 10,000 people who were Muslim or of Middle Eastern backgrounds, and had 2,000 people in the US under surveillance at various times, law enforcement officials said. [LA Times 11/6/04; NY Post 11/6/04; Associated Press 11/4/04] According to intelligence and FBI officials, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is also working closely with the FBI on domestic terror investigations, providing instant access to international databases to determine whether suspects might have contacts with terror organizations abroad. [USA Today 11/8/04]

Related entries:

ICE Plans Immigration Sweeps

AALDEF OFFERS FREE REPRESENTATION TO PEOPLE TARGETED BY FBI'S "OCTOBER PLAN"

Ashcroft Out, Gonzales In?

from Immigration News Briefs (INB)

Attorney General John Ashcroft announced on Nov. 9 that he would resign. Ashcroft was favored by Christian fundamentalist sectors of the Republican political base and was widely criticized by rights advocates for his antagonism toward immigrants and civil liberties. Ashcroft presided over a federal dragnet that apprehended and deported hundreds of Arabs and South Asians on immigration violations under the pretext of the "war on terror." [New York Times 11/10/04; Washington Post 11/10/04]

On Nov. 10, President George W. Bush nominated White House counsel Alberto Gonzales to succeed Ashcroft as attorney general. Gonzales has publicly defended the Bush administration's policy of detaining terrorism suspects for extended periods without access to lawyers or courts. He is best known for his January 25, 2002 memo stating that the "war against terrorism" creates a "new paradigm" which "renders obsolete Geneva's strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners and renders quaint some of its provisions." Gonzales must be confirmed by the Senate before he can take office. [AP 11/10/04; ACLU Press Release 11/10/04; American Progress 11/10/04]

October 13, 2004

U.S. seizes webservers from independent media sites

Rachel Shabi

Monday October 11, 2004

The Guardian

American authorities have shut down 20 independent media centres by seizing their British-based webservers.

On Thursday a court order was issued to Rackspace, an American-owned web hosting company in Uxbridge, Middlesex, forcing it to hand over two servers used by Indymedia, an international media network which covers social justice issues and provides a "news-wire," to which its users contribute.

The websites affected by the seizure span 17 countries.

It is unclear why, or to where, the servers have been taken. The FBI, speaking to the French AFP, acknowledged that a subpoena had been issued but said this was at the request of Italian and Swiss authorities.

"It is not an FBI operation," said its spokesman, Joe Parris.

Rackspace told Indymedia that it had been served with a court order under the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty, under which countries assist each other in investigations such as international terrorism, kidnapping and money laundering.

It is unclear why such a treaty would apply in this context. A UK Indymedia journalist said: "The authorities may just be using this as a trawling exercise. We don't know."

It is also unclear if the Home Office was involved.

The Metropolitan police said it was not aware of the move.

The UK Indymedia site is now working, because it was backed up on another server, unlike others which are still shut down.

One of the servers was to be used to stream web radio coverage of the European Social Forum conference in London next week.

September 07, 2004

DETROIT TERROR CASE COLLAPSES

On Sept. 2, federal judge Gerald E. Rosen of Detroit threw out the convictions of Moroccan nationals Abdel-Ilah Elmardoudi and Karim Koubriti in a case once billed by Attorney General John Ashcroft as a major victory in his administration's "war on terror." Elmardoudi and Koubriti, who were convicted of terrorism and document fraud in June 2003, remain in custody and face a new trial on the fraud charges. Co-defendant Ahmed Hannan, also Moroccan, was convicted of document fraud; he was released this year to a halfway house on an electronic tether. A fourth man was acquitted in the case.

The reversal came a day after federal prosecutors handed in a nine-month review ordered by the judge and asked that he overturn the convictions. Prosecutors blame missteps in the case on Richard Convertino, who was removed last year as lead prosecutor and is under investigation [see INB 2/7/04]. "The prosecution committed a pattern of mistakes and oversights that deprived the defendants of discoverable evidence" and "created a record filled with misleading inferences that such material did not exist," the review found. David Cole, a Georgetown University law professor, said the Detroit case "fits into a broader pattern of the Ashcroft Justice Department overplaying its hand in terror cases and making broad allegations of terror without the evidence to back it up." [New York Times 9/2/04, 9/3/04]

Continue reading "DETROIT TERROR CASE COLLAPSES" »

September 01, 2004

U.S. Asks for Dismissal of Terrorism Convictions

September 1, 2004
The New York Times
By DANNY HAKIM

DETROIT, Aug. 31 - The Justice Department has asked a federal judge to throw out terrorism convictions against two Arab men accused of forming a sleeper cell based here, people involved in the case said Tuesday. The move abandons the crucial charge in what was the first major terrorism trial after the Sept. 11 attacks.

The department has also conceded errors in its handling of the case, though it will pursue a new trial on document fraud charges, the sources said.

"The defense is ecstatic about their decision, and while we had hoped the case would have been dismissed in its entirety, we believe we are up to the challenge of the document fraud case," said Jim Thomas, a lawyer for one of the defendants.

The department is expected to make the decision public on Wednesday. It was first reported Tuesday evening by The Associated Press.

In June 2003, the government won convictions on a material support of terrorism charge against two of four Arab men it accused of forming what it called a "sleeper operational combat cell." It also won a document fraud conviction against a third man. A fourth man was acquitted.

At the time, the administration hailed the convictions as a major victory in the fight against terrorism.

"Today's convictions send a clear message," Attorney General John Ashcroft said at the time. "The Department of Justice will work diligently to detect, disrupt and dismantle the activities of terrorist cells in the United States and abroad."

But the case unraveled on several fronts.

The lead prosecutor, Richard Convertino, was removed late last year and is being investigated for misconduct. He, in turn, has filed a lawsuit against the Justice Department and accused his superiors of retaliating against him after he agreed to testify before the Senate Finance Committee about terrorism. The committee's chairman, Senator Charles E. Grassley, an Iowa Republican and a persistent critic of the Justice Department, has characterized Mr. Convertino as a whistle-blower.

New prosecutors said at a hearing in December that they had discovered important evidence that had been withheld and should have been turned over to the defense, including material that raised questions about the credibility of the government's star witness.

At the hearing, the federal judge, Gerald E. Rosen, admonished Mr. Ashcroft for violating an order barring discussion of the case.

Judge Rosen also ordered a scouring of the case file, which lasted for more than six months before federal prosecutors recently turned over a substantial amount of new evidence to the defense. The evidence has not been made public because the judge has forbidden lawyers to discuss the case. Defense lawyers had been expected to refile a motion to dismiss the case based on the new evidence.

Justice Department officials did not return calls for comment.

The case began just six days after the Sept. 11 attacks, when federal agents raided an apartment in Dearborn, a suburb of Detroit with a large and prominent Arab-American community. The apartment had once been occupied by an Arab immigrant on the government's terrorism watch list, but agents instead found three Arab immigrants as well as forged passports and identification papers and more than 100 religious audiotapes espousing what the government said were radical views.

Agents also found a day planner with crude sketches that prosecution witnesses said included an outline of an American air base in Turkey used to patrol Iraq's no-fly zone. And they found what looked like a tourist's videotape that prosecutors contended was interspersed with video of sites including Disneyland and the New York Times building.

August 25, 2004

U.S. Judge Blasts FBI Case Against Albany Muslims

August 24, 2004

By REUTERS

ALBANY, N.Y. (Reuters) - Two Islamic men accused of supporting terrorism after an FBI sting operation were ordered released from jail on Tuesday by a judge who blasted the government's case by saying there is no evidence they have any links to terrorists.

U.S. Magistrate David Homer ruled Yassin Aref and Mohammed Hossain should be released on $250,000 bonds and held in home detention under electronic surveillance while they await trial. He said that could take up to two years so the men will be allowed to work and attend mosque until the trial.

The pair had been ordered held without bail earlier this month -- a ruling largely based on an address book that prosecutors said was found in an Iraqi terrorist training camp. The book referred to Aref as ``the commander'' in Arabic.

The government now says that translation was an error and the word is "brother'' in Kurdish.

The order to release the two comes amid criticism that the Bush administration's anti-terrorism policies have caused authorities to leap to unfounded conclusions in cases that have fizzled or been dropped altogether after initial high-profile announcements.

Muslims in Albany -- home to about 7,000 followers of Islam -- have called the arrest of the two men a tragic misunderstanding and many have avoided attending mosques out of fear of being labeled terrorists.

Aref, 34, the leader of an Albany mosque, and Hossain, 49, a pizzeria owner, were arrested in a sting operation in which authorities said they agreed to help an FBI informant launder $50,000 from the sale of a shoulder-fired missile as part of a fake plan to assassinate a Pakistani diplomat.

They pleaded not guilty to charges of money laundering, supporting terrorism and conspiracy on Aug. 10.

NO TERRORIST LINK

The judge chided the government, saying the case is much weaker now than it first appeared. He said the two were not plotting violence and are not a danger to the community.

"The evidence in this case appears less strong today,'' Homer said. ``There is no evidence ... to support the claim that Mr. Aref has any contact with any terrorist organization.''

"There still is no evidence of Mr. Hossain's involvement with any terrorist organization,'' he said.

The judge said the case could take one to two years to come to trial as much of the evidence has to be translated from foreign languages.

Defense attorney Terence Kindlon said the government was not merely overzealous but had presented false information.

"We've gone from something that sounded sinister and ominous and scary and terrible to zero in less than two weeks,'' he told the judge. ``Our government doesn't need to go after a pizza man and an Iman who are perfectly innocent.''

He added: ``All we have here is basically the wreckage of the first hearing at which the government presented a lot of information that turned out to be bogus.''

Members of Aref's and Hossain's families were tearful during the hearing, but they were greatly relieved by the ruling, said Faisal Ahmad, a teacher at Aref's mosque.

"I think they are very thankful to God,'' he said. ``We just have to be patient. It's a test. Everything is a test.''

Prosecutors argued that whether the word was "commander'' or ``brother'' was irrelevant and does not affect the criminal charges the two men face. They say the pair were willing participants in the sting operation set up by the FBI.

Defense attorneys argued that Hossain thought the money was a loan, that Aref was brought in to unofficially witness the deal and that both men were victims of entrapment.

Under terms of their release, which is likely in one to two days, neither men may leave the area without permission. While both men have surrendered their passports, Hossain's five children would surrender theirs as well.

August 06, 2004

MAJOR ASIAN AMERICAN PUNDIT WRITES BOOK JUSTIFYING THE INTERNMENT

I just had to post this immediately, not much time to compose a newsflash; here's an email I just got from historian Greg Robinson (author of By Order of the President: FDR and the Internment of Japanese Americans), who is an advisor for Life or Liberty.

Dear friends and colleagues,

You may have heard by now of the egregious new book IN DEFENSE OF INTERNMENT, by the FOX news correspondent and right-wing columnist Michelle Malkin. The book purports to justify the removal and incarceration of the Japanese Americans, in the service of advocating racial profiling by the Bush Administration. I believe that Malkin's work is a terrible distortion of history, and may cause damage among people unexposed to the proper facts, especially as the author is a mell-known and connected media figure whose last book was a bestseller. I have therefore joined Eric Muller, author of the fine book on the WWII JA draft resisters, FREE TO DIE FOR THEIR COUNTRY, in contributing a set of critiques of the book, showing its historical errors and ideologically-driven thesis. Our set of 11 texts is posted on a blog, the Volokh Conspiracy, which has a large readership:

http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2004_08_00.shtml#1091629458

It is important that we get our voices heard and head off this book before the author starts on the Talking Head circuit.

Best
Greg

Many of you may be shocked to know there's people out there who have recently argued and written books justifying the internment of Japanese Americans. To catch up with what I know on the topic, you can read the online debate I had with one of these people last year:

Archived posts on the WWII internment

This debate arose from the story that Representative Coble, who was (still is?) Chair of the House of Representatives Subcommittee on Domestic Security, had made comments favorable to the WWII internment on the radio, and has never retracted them.

Michelle Malkin is a substantial darling of the right wing; the fact she's Asian American may well lend legitimacy to the "pro-internment" side of a debate officially settled years ago, and bring others out of their hidey-holes.

Get ready.

July 28, 2004

Arrests Tie Charity Group to Palestinian Terrorists

The New York Times By ERIC LICHTBLAU

WASHINGTON, July 27 - Five former leaders of the Holy Land Foundation, once the biggest Islamic charity in the United States, were arrested Tuesday on charges that they funneled $12.4 million to Palestinian terrorists. But two other charity officials wanted by the government were able to leave the country recently for the Middle East while they were under criminal investigation.

Law enforcement officials said the arrests represented one of their most important efforts since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to stem the flow of money to terrorists from the United States. Holy Land exploited American tax laws "to bankroll terror," said Michael J. Garcia, an assistant secretary at the Department of Homeland Security.

Lawyers for Holy Land promised to fight the charges vigorously, accusing the F.B.I. of fabricating evidence. They said the group had supported orphans, medical relief and other charitable causes in the Middle East and never knowingly gave money to Hamas, a Palestinian terrorist group, or any other organization promoting violence.

Continue reading "Arrests Tie Charity Group to Palestinian Terrorists" »

June 16, 2004

Government goes to great pains to legalize torture

Bush and Rumsfeld painted the U.S. abuse of prisoners in Iraq as the work of a few individuals. So how do you explain this August 1, 2002 memo from Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel for Alberto R. Gonzales, counsel to President Bush?

"Re: Standards of Conduct for Interrogation under 18 U.S.C. 2340-2340A" (pdf)

Source: Justice Dept. Memo Says Torture 'May Be Justified'
The Washington Post

What the memo painstakingly does is explain how under U.S. law (Sections 23402340A of title 18 of the United States Code), anything you do to a prisoner short of death, permanent injury, or lasting mental harm does not constitute torture:

"Because the acts inflicting torture are extreme, there is (a) significant range of acts that though they might constitute cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment fail to rise to the level of torture." (p. 46)
The memo also helpfully points out:
"...both the European Court on Human Rights and the Israeli Supreme Court have recognized a wide array of acts that constitute cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, but do not amount to torture. Thus, they appear to permit, under international law, an aggressive interpretation as to what amounts to torture..."
This, plus Bush's June 10 comments:

Continue reading "Government goes to great pains to legalize torture" »